MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969351646 · doi:10.1021/ef0002795

About the Colloidal Nature of Asphaltenes and the MW of Covalent Monomeric Units

2002· article· en· W1969351646 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphalteneChemistryDissociation (chemistry)DesorptionOsmometerCovalent bondMonomerIonizationColloidAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Vapor pressure osmometryMass spectrometryVapor pressureOrganic chemistryChromatographyPolymerIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problems surrounding molecular aggregation, covalent molecular weight, and their experimental investigation in asphaltene chemistry are reviewed. Chromatographic, fluorescence spectroscopic, and mass spectroscopic (MS) methods for the investigation of these problems are surveyed and their merits and limitations discussed. Dissociation of asphaltene in dilute solution can be followed in time by monitoring the gel permeation retention time variation with the age of the solution. This way, Athabasca asphaltene was reported to dissociate from several thousand to less than about 1000 g mol - 1 molecular weight (MW) species in CH 2 Cl 2 solution to an extent of at least 80% in 14 days' time. The dissociation products represent the monomeric covalent molecules of asphaltene, and the remaining undissociated 20% could be slowly dissociating aggregates or high-MW covalent asphaltenes. The vapor pressure osmometry (VPO) determined number average MW of the same asphaltene was of the order of 4000 g mol - 1, manifesting the aggregated state of the asphaltene at the higher concentrations used for VPO measurements. Of the MS methods, the most thoroughly investigated and proposed to be the best suited to asphaltene studies are the laser desorption ionization/matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (LDI, MALDI) time-of-flight (TOF) MS. However, results obtained from various laboratories do not compare well; in some cases the bulk of the m / z lies below 1000, and in others it lies well above m / z 1000. 252 Cf plasma desorption MS data are more self-consistent in the sense that the bulk of m / z values always lie below m / z 1000. The upper m / z limit in most cases is around a few thousand m / z but may extend up to tens of thousands m / z . The problems affecting these methods for the determination of covalent, monomeric asphaltene MW distributions are fragmentation of covalent bonds, multiple ionization, and the production of cluster ions. Fluorescence-based methods are not suitable for MW measurements in asphaltene; the reasons for this are discussed in detail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it