Formation of Inclusion Complexes between 1,1′-Dialkyl-3,3′-(1,4-phenylene)bisimidazolium Dibromide Salts and Cucurbit[7]uril
Bibliographic record
Abstract
N,N'-Dialkyl-(1,4-phenylene)bisimidazolium salts form inclusion complexes with cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) with high association constants. The stoichiometry of the complexes depends on the alkyl chains and on the relative concentration of the imidazolium salt and CB[7]. The binding interactions of CB[7] with these bisimidazolium salts were studied experimentally by (1)H NMR, high resolution mass spectroscopy, and UV spectroscopy, and theoretically by semiempirical molecular modeling. Nonlinear regression analysis was used to calculate or estimate the binding parameters for the supramolecular inclusion complexes present in solution. The detailed study of the binding association of these imidazolium salts may allow us to understand the exact role of each recognition site in these salts and to assemble higher supramolecular complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".