MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969363375 · doi:10.1021/ic900742q

Electrochemical and Electronic Structure Investigations of the [S<sub>3</sub>N<sub>3</sub>]<sup>•</sup>Radical and Kinetic Modeling of the [S<sub>4</sub>N<sub>4</sub>]<sup><i>n</i></sup>/[S<sub>3</sub>N<sub>3</sub>]<sup><i>n</i></sup>(<i>n</i>= 0, −1) Interconversion

2009· article· en· W1969363375 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Lethbridge
KeywordsChemistryElectron transferElectrochemistryReaction rate constantGlassy carbonRedoxElectron paramagnetic resonanceSolvationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Physical chemistryKinetic energyStandard electrode potentialIonRotating disk electrodeCyclic voltammetryCrystallographyKineticsElectrodeInorganic chemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Voltammetric studies of S(4)N(4) employing both cyclic (CV) and rotating disk (RDE) methods in CH(2)Cl(2) at a glassy carbon electrode reveal a one-electron reduction at -1.00 V (versus ferrocene/ferrocenium), which produces a second redox couple at -0.33 V, confirmed to be the electrochemically generated [S(3)N(3)](-) by CV studies on its salts. Diffusion coefficients (CH(2)Cl(2)/0.4 M [(n)Bu(4)N][PF(6)]) estimated by RDE methods: S(4)N(4), 1.17 x 10(-5) cm(2) s(-1); [S(3)N(3)](-), 4.00 x 10(-6) cm(2) s(-1). Digital simulations of the CVs detected slow rates of electron transfer for both couples and allowed for a determination of rate constants for homogeneous chemical reaction steps subsequent to electron transfer. The common parameters (k(f1) = 2.0 +/- 0.5 s(-1), k(s1) = 0.034 +/- 0.004 cm s(-1) for [S(4)N(4)](-/0); k(f2) = 0.4 +/- 0.2 s(-1), k(s2) = 0.022 +/- 0.005 cm s(-1) for [S(3)N(3)](-/0) at T = 21 +/- 2 degrees C) fit well to a "square-scheme" mechanism over the entire range of data with first order decay of both redox products. An alternate model could also be fit wherein [NS](*) liberated in the first step reacts with formed [S(3)N(3)](*) to reproduce S(4)N(4) with an apparent second order rate constant k(f2)' = 1.1 +/- 0.3 x 10(3) M(-1) s(-1). The crystal structure of [PPN][S(3)N(3)] was determined by X-ray crystallography indicating the solvation of the anion by 1 equiv of methanol. The generated [S(4)N(4)](-*) radical anion was detected by the Simultaneous Electrochemical Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (SEEPR) method to give: (a) [(32)S(4)(14)N(4)](-*), 9 lines, a((14)N) = 0.118 mT; (b) [(32)S(4)(15)N(4)](-*), 5 lines, a((15)N) = 0.164 mT; (c) [(33)S(4)(14)N(4)](-*), estimated a((14)N) = 0.118, a((33)S = 0.2 mT); g = 2.0008(1). Equivalence of (33)S hyperfine splittings is consistent with dynamic averaging of the C(2v) geometry in solution. High-level electronic structure calculations provide evidence for an open-shell doublet triradicaloid character to the ground state wave function of [S(3)N(3)](*).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it