MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969412801 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2015.2411739

Dynamic Operations of Cloud Radio Access Networks (C-RAN) for Mobile Cloud Computing Systems

2015· article· en· W1969412801 on OpenAlexafffund
Mark Yep-Kui Chua, F. Richard Yu, Shengrong Bu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCloud computingRadio access networkC-RANComputer scienceComputer networkDistributed computingOptimization problemWirelessChannel state informationUser equipmentMobile cloud computingWireless networkMobile computingTelecommunicationsBase stationAlgorithmMobile station

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we jointly consider cloud radio access networks (C-RAN) and mobile cloud computing (MCC) in a holistic framework. In particular, we study how to dynamically operate C-RAN to enhance the end-to-end performance of MCC services in next-generation wireless networks. An intrinsic challenge in such a system is that channel state information (CSI) is outdated. With delayed CSI, only suboptimal C-RAN operations can be made if deterministic optimization techniques are applied directly. We formulate the topology configuration and rate-allocation problem with delayed CSI under a stochastic optimization framework. Such a framework maximizes MCC services' sum throughput with constraints on the response latency experienced by each MCC user. We propose an optimal policy for the stochastic optimization problem, which has the advantage of low computation cost. Offline and online algorithms are developed based on the optimal policy. Using simulation results, we show that, with the emergence of MCC and C-RAN technologies, the design and operation of future mobile wireless networks can be significantly affected by cloud computing, and the proposed scheme is capable of achieving substantial performance gains over existing schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207