MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969421283 · doi:10.1107/s0108767305081390

<i>In-situ</i>X-ray diffraction during pulsed laser deposition

2005· article· en· W1969421283 on OpenAlexaff
Vedran Vonk, K. Driessen, Mark Huijben, Sybolt Harkema, H. Graafsma

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Materials Characterization Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityBrockhouse Institute for Materials Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn situMaterials scienceDeposition (geology)DiffractionPulsed laser depositionLaserX-ray crystallographyOpticsChemistryGeologyPhysicsGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The x-ray diffraction experiments were performed on LiNbO 3 (LN) and Sr x Ba 1-x Nb 2 O 6 (SBN) crystals grown by modified Stepanov technique in bulk-profiled configuration using dies of capillary type with different cross-sections. The lattice defects were visualized by x-ray topography. The experiments show the presence in LN samples mosaic blocks drawn out along pulling direction with sizes 5-20 mm in this direction and 0.3-2.0 mm in perpendicular to growth axis. Adjacent blocks were also misoriented with respect to each other with average angles of 6 arc min. Structure distortions for c-cut of bulk-profiled LN have a character of concentric rings, those form and sizes match to the die construction. The picture of structural imperfections depends on growth conditions forming of crystal-melt interface. For profiled LN grown in high temperature gradients the phase interface was inhomogeneous: flat over die plates, concave to the capillaries. The position of rocking curve maximum depends on xray incident angle and displaces together linear scanning along LN sample surface. It indicates the presence of crystallographic plane bend of 0.6+-0.1 degree. Low thermal conductivity of SBN crystals leads to formation of convex to the crystal crystallization front what allows to eliminate such lattice defects as small angle grain boundaries and as a result to obtain crystals of high optical quality. Atomic structure of SBN (x=0.33; 0.61;0.75) was investigated. Peculiarities of distribution of Sr and Ba ions as well as Ce, Tm doping ions in lattice channels are determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of CrystallographySame topicAdvanced Materials Characterization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207