Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A discussion is presented of the evaluation of multiple relaxation components from water protons in biological tissue. The principal focus is to draw attention to the way in which limitations in the raw NMR data, such as signal‐to‐noise ratio, data sampling density and acquisition window width, affect the precision and resolution in the processed multiple component solution of the return to thermal equilibrium. The second issue discussed is the interpretation of these multiple components in terms of microstructural compartments of the biological sample and, thirdly, we outline some of the successes in determining regional and pathological variations in microstructure in the human body in‐vivo , using the technique of multiple relaxation components. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Abbreviations used: CNS central nervous system CPMG Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill sequence RBC red blood cells NMR nuclear magnetic resonance NNLS non‐negative least squares PNS peripheral nervous system SNR signal‐to‐noise ratio TE echo time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it