MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969509818 · doi:10.7202/016355ar

Le voyage de Diderot en Russie

2007· article· fr· W1969509818 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Inna Gorbatov

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes littéraires · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le 6 juillet 1762, neuf jours exactement après le coup d’état du 28 juin qui l’a mise sur le trône, Catherine II invite Denis Diderot à venir en Russie pour y publier L’encyclopédie , qui a été interdite à Paris. Diderot arrive à Saint-Pétersbourg en octobre 1773, où il demeure cinq mois. Catherine II traite son invité en personne « distinguée » et passe beaucoup de temps avec lui. Dans ses discussions quotidiennes avec l’impératrice, Diderot aborde les questions politiques, économiques, sociales, juridiques et artistiques. Malheureusement, il se trouve en Russie pendant la période où Catherine est le moins disposée à accepter ses idéaux démocratiques, puisqu’elle est préoccupée par la révolte paysanne de Pougatchev et par la guerre contre la Turquie. Rien ne suggère que le séjour de Diderot à Saint-Pétersbourg ait particulièrement réjouissant ou satisfaisant. Mais une fois rentré en France, Diderot a voulu que ses correspondants et la plupart de ses amis croient exactement le contraire. Il a décrit son séjour en Russie sous le meilleur jour et a toujours été généreux en compliments pour Catherine II.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.013
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes littérairesSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207