MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Examination of TIMP-1 Levels and Relapse-Free Survival for Patients in NCIC CTG MA.14 Who Received Adjuvant Tamoxifen +/- Octreotide LAR.

2009· article· en· W1969517177 on OpenAlexaff
Suhail M. Ali, Judy-Anne Chapman, Allan Lipton, Kim Leitzel, K. I. Pritchard, Xuan Pu, C. Wilson, Walter P. Carney, Lois E. Shepherd, Michaël Pollak

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreMcGill UniversityQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineTamoxifenOncologyChemotherapyOctreotideBreast cancerAntiestrogenRandomized controlled trialGastroenterologyCancerEndocrinologySomatostatin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) has been shown to have diverse multifunctional roles in tumorigenesis. AL/KL/SA postulated from first line metastatic endocrine therapy that elevated pre-treatment serum TIMP-1 required additional therapy. NCIC CTG MA.14 adjuvant endocrine trial permitted examination of whether TIMP-1 serum levels post-chemotherapy was associated with RFS. Methods: NCIC CTG MA.14 is a trial where 667 postmenopausal patients were randomized to receive adjuvant tamoxifen +/- octreotide LAR with a stratification factor of no, concurrent or sequential chemotherapy. For the purposes of this work, this was simplified to whether a patient had or had not received adjuvant chemotherapy prior to the serum draw. Serum TIMP-1 was assessed on >90% of the trial patients. We examined the effect of baseline TIMP-1 levels on relapse-free survival (RFS) of 1) all types, 2) bone only, 3) all types of bone, and 4) non-bone, by timing of chemotherapy before the serum draw utilizing continuous TIMP (ng/ml) and categorical TIMP (<454, >454 ng/ml, based on 95% non-parametric cut-point for healthy post-menopausal females). Data were available on patient and tumour characteristics of age (years), pathologic tumour size (cm), pathologic lymph node status (# nodes), IGF-1, C-peptide, IGFBP-3. Step-wise forward Cox multivariate models were used where a factor was added if p<=0.05, and interaction terms were added for TIMP-1 level and timing of chemotherapy. Results: High (categorical) TIMP-1 was significantly associated with longer RFS (p=0.04) in the non-bone RFS multivariate model in the subgroup of patients who had prior chemotherapy, but not in those who did not. The interaction between TIMP-1 and administration of chemotherapy before serum draw was significant (p=0.02). High (continuous) TIMP-1 was significantly associated with longer bone only RFS (p=0.04) in subgroup who had no chemotherapy before the serum draw, but not in those who may or may not have had it after. There was no significant interaction effect. Categorical and continuous TIMP-1 were not associated with any other type of RFS. Conclusions: We found a predictive benefit with the assessment of serum TIMP-1 in hormone receptor positive patients, that high TIMP-1 levels after adjuvant chemotherapy were predictive of a reduction in non-bone RFS. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 3022.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→