MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969528421 · doi:10.1029/1999tc900060

Seismic images and three‐dimensional architecture of a Proterozoic shear zone in the Sudbury Structure (Superior Province, Canada)

2000· article· en· W1969528421 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David E. Boerner, B. Milkereit, Juntao Wu, Matthew H. Salisbury

Bibliographic record

VenueTectonics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyShear zoneProterozoicIgneous rockSeismologyOrogenyShear (geology)PlutonPetrologyArcheanDeformation (meteorology)PaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A broad zone of intense ductile to brittle deformation transects the Paleo‐Proterozoic Sudbury Igneous Complex and likely formed during the final stages of the Penokean orogeny on the southern margin of the Superior Province. Herein we present a three‐dimensional image of this deformation zone, derived from four seismic reflection profiles. Additional information from rock property measurements, drill results, and published structural mapping suggests that the seismic data define the three‐dimensional disposition of listric shear zones. The seismic image of the deformation is best developed within the Onaping Formation. However, the images of the deformation zone envelope are imperfect, being most clear where truncating known contacts within the Sudbury Igneous Complex and its contact with Huronian host rocks. The southern edge of the seismically imaged shear zones does not extend significantly beyond the exposed Sudbury Igneous Complex, suggesting limits to the extent of deformation in the Sudbury Structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTectonicsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207