MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969533630 · doi:10.1115/sbc2008-193210

A Numerical and Experimental Study of Blood Disturbances in a Stented Arterial Segment: Flat vs. Cylindrical Mock-Ups

2008· article· en· W1969533630 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Mejia, Rosaire Mongrain, Guy Drapeau, Josep Cabau-Rodes, Olivier F. Bertrand

Bibliographic record

VenueASME 2008 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and B · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngioplastyBlood flowCardiologyBalloonMedicineCoronary artery diseaseArteryInternal medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today cardiac complications are the leading cause of death in the developed world [1]. Millions of people suffer from cardiovascular disease, with most of the cases caused by or related to atherosclerosis. Historically, blood flow in stenosed arteries has been restored by means of balloon angioplasty. In 1987 stents were introduced to the procedure in order to provide structural support to the diseased artery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME 2008 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and BSame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207