MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of histamine H3 receptor blockade on venous return and splanchnic hemodynamics in experimental bacteremia

2002· article· en· W1969541209 on OpenAlexaff
Gregg Eschun, Edgar Bautista, Krika Duke, Hans Jacobs, R. Bruce Light, D. Böse, Steven N. Mink

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMast cells and histamine
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSplanchnicBlockadeBacteremiaHistamineAnesthesiaHemodynamicsVenous return curveInternal medicineReceptorMicrobiologyAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: In the heart, histamine H3 receptors may function as inhibitory presynaptic receptors that decrease adrenergic neural norepinephrine release in conditions of enhanced sympathetic tone. In a previous study, we found that H3 receptor blockade improved cardiac contractility and systemic hemodynamics in experimental bacteremia in dogs. Because histamine H3 receptors have been found in the splanchnic circulation in other animal models, it was not clear the extent to which H3 receptor blockade may have altered splanchnic hemodynamics, and variables of venous return, that in turn contributed to the overall improvement in systemic hemodynamics observed in the previous experiment. In the present study, we examined splanchnic hemodynamics in the presence of H3 receptor blockade in a canine model of Escherichia coli bacteremia. DESIGN: Bacteremia was produced by intravenous infusion of live E. coli administered throughout the experiment. Variables of venous return included mean systemic pressure, resistance to venous return, and mean right atrial pressure. Splanchnic measurements included hepatic and portal pressures and flows. Measurements were obtained before and after H3 receptor blockade with thioperamide maleate. The animals were studied while ventilated and anesthetized. RESULTS: H3 receptor blockade caused a decrease in mean right atrial pressure from 5.9 mm Hg pretreatment to 3.5 mm Hg posttreatment (p < .05), although it did not affect mean systemic pressure or resistance to venous return. There were no changes in portal or hepatic flows after H3 receptor blockade. The cardiac function curve after H3 receptor blockade was shifted upward and to the left compared with the pretreatment curve. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the primary effect of H3 receptor blockade in experimental bacteremia was attributable to an increase in inotropy. There was no evidence to indicate that H3 receptor activation contributed to altered splanchnic hemodynamics in this model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicMast cells and histamineFrench-language works237,207