Transcriptional Analysis of the Glutamate Dehydrogenase Gene in the Primitive Eukaryote, Giardia lamblia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied gene expression in the ancient eukaryote, Giardia lamblia, by taking advantage of assays developed recently in our laboratory, which allow new genetic analyses of this organism. We examined the transcription of a 2.2-kilobase segment of the Giardia genome that contains the glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) gene and a portion of a second open reading frame encoding an uncharacterized gene. Nuclear run-on analyses showed that the genes are transcribed as two separate units spaced less than 200 base pairs apart, and transcription of the GDH gene initiates just 3-6 nucleotides upstream of its translation start codon. We characterized the GDH promoter by transfecting Giardia with DNA constructs that used the GDH upstream sequence to drive the expression of a luciferase reporter gene. By deletion and mutational analyses, we localized promoter function to three motifs within a 50-base pair region of the GDH upstream sequence. Using band shift assays and UV cross-linking, we demonstrated specific binding of a 68-kDa protein from Giardia nuclear extracts to short poly(T) tracts contained within two of the sequence motifs on single-stranded DNA from the promoter region. This report describes one of the first functional gene promoter and its cognate DNA-binding protein in this primitive eukaryote.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".