MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969551085 · doi:10.1080/00221680209499915

Contribution on transient flow modelling in storm sewers

2002· article· en· W1969551085 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydraulic Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Free surfaceMechanicsTransient flowSurgeFlow (mathematics)Front (military)Sanitary sewerMeteorologyGeologyEnvironmental scienceComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, the Preissmann slot model still enjoys popularity in modelling the transition between free-surface and fully pressurised flows in tail-race tunnels. However a fully dynamic and transient modelling technique is needed to predict the surge front location and velocity, the pressure rise in the full flow zone and the water depth change in the free-surface zone. In this paper, the transient flow is modelled and only one surge front is considered. Three 1 -D models, which differ from each other by the computational method used to calculate either the free-surface or the full flow conditions, have been developed and applied successfully to both laboratory and field data. Predictions have been compared to measurements and good agreement found. Comparison between the three fully dynamic models was done and selective criteria were forwarded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it