MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969570908 · doi:10.1037/h0088111

Review of Career counseling: A narrative approach.

2001· article· en· W1969570908 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anne Marshall

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCognitive and psychological constructs research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyNarrativePsychotherapistCareer counselingCounseling psychologyPsychoanalysisApplied psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LARRY COCHRAN Career Counseling: A Narrative Approach Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2000, x + 166 pages (ISBN 0-7619-0442-5, us$35, Softcover) Reviewed by ANNE MARSHALL This book introduces narrative approach to career counselling. The author specifically makes the distinction that this is counselling approach, not career development theory. A narrative approach invites counsellors to make their career interventions with clients more personal. In contrast to the traditional objective emphasis in career counselling, this is subjective approach that emphasizes meaning and meaning-making. Cochran characterizes the central task of career counselling as emplotment rather than matching. Emplotment involves casting the individual as the main character in career narrative that is meaningful, productive, and fulfilling. Cochran's approach makes use of literary models and constructivist methods. He draws upon the personal construct approach of George Kelly (1955), as well as the writings of more recent authors such as Robert Neimeyer (1987) and Mark Savickas (1993). Specific client examples are used to illustrate the concepts and techniques presented. Canadian readers will appreciate an approach that does not rely on the American content that is so prominent in books focused on career. In Chapter 1, Cochran argues that narratives constitute our primary way of making meaning in the world. A narrative provides temporal organization in our lives, integrating beginning, middle, and an end into whole. Career counselling is concerned with narratives that empasize the future. The individual must identify with the narrative envisioned. In adopting career narrative, person tries to match an ideal vision with the possibilities offered by available options. This is continuous, dialectic process in which the individual is actively constructing meaning. These personal meanings are then expanded, refined, tested, and revised over the life course, resulting in unique career narrative. Cochran maintains that career counselling must focus on a person's capacity for future decisions and actions, what has been termed practical wisdom and sense of agency (p. 31). The standards for judging an ideal narrative include wholeness, harmony, agency, and fruitfulness. To help clients explore and emplot or implement their career narratives, Cochran proposes seven (rather than steps): Elaborating Career Problem, Composing Life History, Founding Future Narrative, Constructing Reality, Changing Life Structure, Enacting Role, and Crystallizing Decision. These episodes are intended to enhance deciding and acting, practical wisdom, and sense of agency. They are not meant to be followed in rigid fashion: different clients require different episodes, or different coordination and ordering of the episodes. Also, the arrangement of episodes might change as the course of counselling evolves. Elaborating career problem (Chapter 2) is critical first step. A problem is gap between client's actual state of affairs and his or her desired state. Counsellor and client must form working alliance, which includes agreement on purpose, agreement on means, and bond of relationship. The techniques of elaboration might include vocational card sort, construct laddering, drawing, testing, and the exploration of stories or anecdotes. Chapter 3 covers the next episode, the composition of the client's life history. This includes assessment as well as active intervention on the part of the counsellor. A counsellor intervenes to correct distortion, improve coherence, enhance agency, consolidate identity, and to prepare the client for other episodes concerned with founding future narrative. Several interview techniques to empower clients' narration are described: Life Line, Life Chapters, Success Experiences, Family Constellation, Role Models, and Early Recollections (pp. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienneSame topicCognitive and psychological constructs researchFrench-language works237,207