MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969583081 · doi:10.1097/bsd.0b013e3181831ef7

Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Identification of the Lenke Classification Lumbar Modifier in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

2009· article· en· W1969583081 on OpenAlexaff
Luc Duong, Farida Chériet, Hubert Labelle, Kmc Cheung, Mark F. Abel, Peter O. Newton, Richard E. McCall, Lawrence G. Lenke, Ian A. F. Stokes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLumbarScoliosisKappaRadiographyNuclear medicineLumbar vertebraeCohen's kappaOrthodonticsReliability (semiconductor)Physical therapyRadiologySurgeryMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Interobserver and intraobserver reliability study for the identification of the Lenke classification lumbar modifier by a panel of experts compared with a computer algorithm. OBJECTIVES: To measure the variability of the Lenke classification lumbar modifier and determine if computer assistance using 3-dimensional spine models can improve the reliability of classification. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The lumbar modifier has been proposed to subclassify Lenke scoliotic curve types into A, B, and C on the basis of the relationship between the central sacral vertical line (CSVL) and the apical lumbar vertebra. Landmarks for identification of the CSVL have not been clearly defined, and the reliability of the actual CSVL position and lumbar modifier selection have never been tested independently. Therefore, the value of the lumbar modifier for curve classification remains unknown. METHODS: The preoperative radiographs of 68 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis presenting a Lenke type 1 curve were measured manually twice by 6 members of the Scoliosis Research Society 3-dimensional classification committee at 6 months interval. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was quantified using the percentage of agreement and kappa statistics. In addition, the lumbar curve of all subjects was reconstructed in 3-dimension using a stereoradiographic technique and was submitted to a computer algorithm to infer the lumbar modifier according to measurements from the pedicles. RESULTS: Interobserver rates for the first trial showed a mean kappa value of 0.56. Second trial rates were higher with a mean kappa value of 0.64. Intraobserver rates were evaluated at a mean kappa value of 0.69. The computer algorithm was successful in identifying the lumbar curve type and was in agreement with the observers by a proportion up to 93%. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between and within observers for the Lenke lumbar modifier is only moderate to substantial with manual methods. Computer assistance with 3-dimensional models of the spine has the potential to decrease this variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Spinal Disorders & TechniquesSame topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207