MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969586381 · doi:10.1002/pssc.200879887

Excitons in perylene tetracarboxdiimide crystals for optoelectronics

2008· article· en· W1969586381 on OpenAlexafffund
Françoise Provencher, Jean‐Frédéric Laprade, Michel Côté, Carlos Silva

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsExcitonMonoclinic crystal systemExcited statePerylenePhotoluminescenceDensity functional theoryMoleculeAnisotropyMaterials scienceAb initioAbsorbancePentaceneMolecular physicsChemistryCrystallographyCondensed matter physicsOpticsComputational chemistryAtomic physicsOptoelectronicsCrystal structurePhysicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this contribution, we present steady‐state and timeresolved photoluminescence measurements, as well as absorbance measurements, on dilute solutions and on solution‐grown crystals of a perylene tetracarboxdiimide derivative (EPPTC). We also present density functional theory (DFT) calculations of their electronic structure. These molecules self‐assemble into highly anisotropic needle‐shaped crystals with monoclinic structure, as revealed by X‐ray diffraction techniques and polarized optical microscopy. We find experimentally that the Huang‐Rhys factor for this molecule is 0.565, which is in good agreement with that extracted from ab initio calculations (0.678). We demonstrate that in a film, the nature of photoexcitations is a vibrationally dressed Frenkel exciton and that these recombine radiatively with a distribution of excited‐state constants centered at ∼ 1 ns–1. (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physicsSame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207