Therapeutic efficacy as predicted by quantitative assessment of murine RIF-1 tumour pH and phosphorous metabolite response during hyperthermia: an<i>in vivo</i><sup>31</sup>P NMR study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Described herein are the initial findings from an 'in-magnet' 31P NMR compatible hyperthermia system capable of concurrently heating and monitoring the metabolic response of murine tumours; the murine radiation induced fibrosarcoma (RIF-1) was employed for these studies. At thermal doses sufficient to raise tumour temperature to 41.5 and 43 degrees C for a period of 30 min, a marked and rapid decrease in nucleoside triphosphate concentration and in pH was observed during the heating period, while inorganic phosphate concentration increased significantly but more gradually. These 31P NMR determined metabolic indices remained depressed/elevated throughout a 1.5 h post-hyperthermia monitoring period. Importantly, these metabolic indices correlated significantly with specific growth delay. This suggests a possible role for NMR spectroscopy in early assessment, and perhaps control, of therapeutic response to hyperthermia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".