MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1969622083 · doi:10.14740/jmc.v6i5.2135

Marked Variation in Serum Chromogranin A Levels in a Patient on Chronic Omeprazole Therapy

2015· article· en· W1969622083 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Theresa Ratajczak, Ankur Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMetanephrinesGastroenterologyInternal medicineChromogranin APalpitationsUrologyUrinary system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Serum chromogranin A (CgA) is used as a standard marker in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors. We report a case with wide fluctuation (more than 10-fold) in serum CgA levels in a patient on chronic omeprazole therapy. A 67-year-old woman with hypothyroidism presented for evaluation of facial flushing for 1 year. Flushing had increased in intensity over the past several months without any provocative factors. She denied any diarrhea, wheezing, headache, palpitations or facial erythema. Her home medications were aspirin, omeprazole, levothyroxine, and raloxifene. The patient reported no improvement in flushing on stopping raloxifene. Physical exam was unremarkable. On blood testing, she was noted to have mildly elevated serum CgA of 18.8 ng/mL (range 1.9 - 15 ng/mL). Other endocrine tests including serum tryptase, 24-hour urine N-methylhistamine, 24-hour urine 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, metanephrines, catecholamines, and serum calcitonin were unremarkable. Serum CgA was repeated because of her continued symptoms. Repeat blood test showed markedly increased CgA value (128 ng/mL). She underwent a CT chest/abdomen/pelvis and octreotide scan. The octreotide scan showed uptake in the right axillary and subcarinal regions. She subsequently underwent endoscopic bronchial ultrasound and mediastinal biopsy of two lymph nodes. Biopsy was negative for any pathological process. PET scan was done to rule out occult malignancies and was negative. Echocardiogram was normal. She was also seen by neurology with unremarkable workup. CgA levels were repeated over a course of three months and levels varied from 126 to 182 ng/mL. She was asked to hold omeprazole for 2 weeks and CgA levels dropped to 24 ng/mL. The patient resumed omeprazole due to worsening reflux. Repeat CgA level three months later on omeprazole was 18 ng/mL. Venlafaxine and paroxetine were tried for flushing but she could not tolerate these due to side effects. It had been previously established that medications which stimulate neuroendocrine cells, in particular proton pump inhibitors (PPI) could lead to falsely elevated CgA levels. The interesting aspect in this case is increase in CgA more than 10-fold and the marked variation in CgA levels while on omeprazole (18 - 182 ng/mL). There is marked variability in serum CgA levels in presence of a PPI as seen in our case. Clinicians should consider repeat testing of CgA levels in setting of abnormal values and also consider stopping contributing medications before testing and making important clinical decisions. J Med Cases. 2015;6(5):232-234 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2135w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Cases→Same topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances→French-language works237,207→