MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969636414 · doi:10.1063/1.4860938

First-principles survey on the doping of Ga in Nd2Fe14B

2014· article· en· W1969636414 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties of Alloys
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic momentSubstitution (logic)Atom (system on chip)DopingDensity functional theoryk-nearest neighbors algorithmMoment (physics)Materials scienceCondensed matter physicsChemistryCrystallographyComputational chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The preferential site substitution of Fe by Ga and its effect on magnetic moments have been studied in Nd2Fe14B by a first-principles density functional calculation. The calculated substitution energies of Ga are positive values and unfavorable for the Ga substitution at the sites of 8j2, 16k1, and 4e, while those are negative values and favorable for the Ga substitution at the sites of 4c, 8j1, and 16k2, in good agreement with the experimental results. The Ga atom shows a small induced negative moment with a size of about 0.2 μB. The magnetic moments of Fe with the nearest neighbor of Ga reduce by about 0.1–0.2 μB while the moments of Nd with the Ga nearest neighbors are enhanced slightly. These magnetic moment changes originate from the hybrid of the Ga 4p- with the Fe 3d- or the Nd 5d-electron states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it