MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969639570 · doi:10.1063/1.1627949

Interfacial slip on a transverse-shear mode acoustic wave device

2003· article· en· W1969639570 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSlip (aerodynamics)Transverse planeBoundary value problemSlip line fieldMechanicsTransverse waveShear (geology)Slip ratioMaterials scienceWave propagationOpticsPhysicsShear stressThermodynamicsComposite materialStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes a mathematical relationship between the slip parameter α and the slip length b for a slip boundary condition applied to the transverse-shear model for a quartz-crystal acoustic wave device. The theory presented here reduces empirical determination of slip to a one-parameter fit. It shows that the magnitude and phase of the slip parameter, which describes the relative motion of the surface and liquid in the transverse-shear model, can be linked to the slip length. Furthermore, the magnitude and phase of the slip parameter are shown to depend on one another. An experiment is described to compare the effects of liquid-surface affinity on the resonant properties of a transverse-shear mode wave device by applying different polar and nonpolar liquids to surfaces of different polarity. The theory is validated with slip values determined from the transverse-shear model and compared to slip length values from literature. Agreement with literature values of slip length is within one order of magnitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it