MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969654320 · doi:10.1159/000241048

Fetal and Placental Growth in the Rat following Differential Reduction of Litter Size

2009· article· en· W1969654320 on OpenAlexaff
P.G. Croskerry, OlusijiF Smith, Samantha M. Hall, B.J. Shepard

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Neonate · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLitterFetusPlacentaBiologyFetal weightEndocrinologyInternal medicineAndrologyPregnancyMedicineGeneticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects on fetal and placental growth of differential litter size reduction on day 10 (LR10) and day 13 (LR13) were determined in the rat. LR10 resulted in significant increments in placental weight, fetal body and brain weight, and brain protein content in the survivors at day 21. A marginal effect on brain cellularity (DNA) was observed. Values for these parameters generally followed the extent of reduction. Placenta weight was also related to original litter size. In contrast, LR13 which was associated with survival of supernumerary placentae (those without a fetus) produced no growth enhancement. Prenatal development was discussed in terms of general systemic influences and hormonal regulatory mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of the NeonateSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207