MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969660353 · doi:10.1109/iciea.2008.4582470

A replacement policy of deteriorating production systems subject to imperfect repairs

2008· article· en· W1969660353 on OpenAlexaff
F.I. Dehayem Nodem, Jean‐Pierre Kenné, Ali Gharbi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImperfectProduction (economics)Computer scienceMarkov decision processTime horizonOperations researchProduction planningMathematical optimizationDecision support systemMarkov processDecision processReliability engineeringEngineeringMathematicsEconomicsArtificial intelligenceMicroeconomicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigated a deteriorating production system subject to random machine breakdowns, imperfect repairs and replacement. The machine produces one type of product and upon each breakdown, an action is chosen between repairs and replace. If the machine is to be repaired, then an imperfect repair is undertaken. If not, the machine is replaced by a new identical one. The decision variables of the system are the repair/replacement and production policies. The objective of the control problem is to find decision variables that minimize the total incurred costs over an infinite planning horizon. A semi-Markov decision process (SMDP), is used to determine the optimal repair/replacement and production policies. A numerical example is given to illustrate the proposed approach and to show the impact of the policies on several failures number.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFrench-language works237,207