MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969700152 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2014.0025

The Outlandish Jane: Austen and Female Identity in Victorian Women’s Magazines

2014· article· en· W1969700152 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marina Cano-López

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)IdeologyNarrativeGirlPoint (geometry)HistoryGender studiesSociologyLiteratureArtLawAestheticsPolitical sciencePsychologyPoliticsDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent research has identified Victorian women’s magazines as a key channel for investigating domestic ideology. From the 1870s to the fin de siècle, women’s periodicals often presented Jane Austen as a publicly acceptable model of the woman writer. This essay focuses on profiles of Austen published in the Englishwoman’s Domestic Magazine, Girl’s Own Paper , and Women’s Penny Paper , investigating how these narratives reiterated and diverged from biographical accounts produced by members of Austen’s family. In these contexts, Austen’s life and works became a point of contention in battles over definitions of female identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0090.017
Scholarly communication0.0130.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207