MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969710891 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2006.426

QRP02-3: SAM: A New Bandwidth Constraint Model for Diff-Serv-Aware MPLS Networks

2006· article· en· W1969710891 on OpenAlexaff
Feilong Xu, Xian Liu, Changcheng Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobecom · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBandwidth (computing)Computer scienceMultiprotocol Label SwitchingConstraint (computer-aided design)Computer networkDynamic bandwidth allocationBandwidth managementDistributed computingQuality of serviceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The next generation IP networks will provide differentiated services to the applications. There is a strong need to design new bandwidth constraint (BC) models to meet the new requirements. A desirable BC model takes both bandwidth isolation and bandwidth utilization into account. Conventional BC models have their limits due to their static nature. In this paper, we propose a new BC model, called the self-adaptive bandwidth constraint model (SAM), in which the priorities of different application classes are adaptively updated. The performance of the SAM is compared with three representative conventional BC models. The simulation results suggest that the SAM has certain advantages over others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobecomSame topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207