MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969712768 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00453.2005

Effect of vitamin C and <scp>l</scp>-NMMA on the inotropic response to dobutamine in patients with heart failure

2005· article· en· W1969712768 on OpenAlexaff
Susanna Mak, Christopher B. Overgaard, Gary E. Newton

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicVitamin C and Antioxidants Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInotropeDobutamineHeart failureMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyVitaminHemodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The positive effect of vitamin C on left ventricular (LV) inotropic responses to dobutamine, observed in patients with preserved LV function, is lost in heart failure (HF). We tested the hypothesis that in HF, endogenous nitric oxide (NO) opposes the positive effect of vitamin C on adrenergically stimulated contractility by examining the effects of vitamin C on dobutamine responses during NO synthase inhibition. In 11 HF patients, a micromanometer-tipped catheter was inserted into the LV and an infusion catheter was positioned in the left main coronary artery. The peak positive rate of change of LV pressure (LV +dP/dt) was measured in response to intravenous dobutamine (Dob-1). After recontrol, intracoronary N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (l-NMMA) was infused before reinfusion of dobutamine (L-NMMA + Dob-2). Finally, intracoronary vitamin C was infused in addition to intracoronary L-NMMA and dobutamine (L-NMMA + Dob-2 + vitamin C). Intracoronary L-NMMA alone had no effect on LV +dP/dt. After a stable inotropic response to intracoronary L-NMMA and dobutamine was established, the addition of intracoronary vitamin C resulted in a modest but significant increase in LV +dP/dt. The change in LV +dP/dt in response to dobutamine alone was 25 +/- 5%, with intracoronary L-NMMA, 27 +/- 6%, and with intracoronary L-NMMA plus vitamin C, 37 +/- 5% (P < 0.05 vs. Dob-1 and L-NMMA + Dob-2). These findings demonstrate that an interaction between endogenous NO and redox environment exists and exerts some influence on stimulated contractility in HF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicVitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchFrench-language works237,207