Effect of vitamin C and <scp>l</scp>-NMMA on the inotropic response to dobutamine in patients with heart failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The positive effect of vitamin C on left ventricular (LV) inotropic responses to dobutamine, observed in patients with preserved LV function, is lost in heart failure (HF). We tested the hypothesis that in HF, endogenous nitric oxide (NO) opposes the positive effect of vitamin C on adrenergically stimulated contractility by examining the effects of vitamin C on dobutamine responses during NO synthase inhibition. In 11 HF patients, a micromanometer-tipped catheter was inserted into the LV and an infusion catheter was positioned in the left main coronary artery. The peak positive rate of change of LV pressure (LV +dP/dt) was measured in response to intravenous dobutamine (Dob-1). After recontrol, intracoronary N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (l-NMMA) was infused before reinfusion of dobutamine (L-NMMA + Dob-2). Finally, intracoronary vitamin C was infused in addition to intracoronary L-NMMA and dobutamine (L-NMMA + Dob-2 + vitamin C). Intracoronary L-NMMA alone had no effect on LV +dP/dt. After a stable inotropic response to intracoronary L-NMMA and dobutamine was established, the addition of intracoronary vitamin C resulted in a modest but significant increase in LV +dP/dt. The change in LV +dP/dt in response to dobutamine alone was 25 +/- 5%, with intracoronary L-NMMA, 27 +/- 6%, and with intracoronary L-NMMA plus vitamin C, 37 +/- 5% (P < 0.05 vs. Dob-1 and L-NMMA + Dob-2). These findings demonstrate that an interaction between endogenous NO and redox environment exists and exerts some influence on stimulated contractility in HF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".