MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969715114 · doi:10.4021/jcgo.v1i4-5.42

Occult Primary Breast Cancer Presenting With Axillary Nodal Metastasis: Report of 3 Cases

2012· article· en· W1969715114 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Karima Oualla, Fatimazahra Elmrabet, Samia Arifi, Nawfel Mellas, My Abdelilah Melhouf, Touria Bouhafa, K. Hassouni, Afaf Amarti, Omar Elmesbahi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerAxillary lymph nodesOccultMetastasisRadiologyAxillaRadiation therapyPrimary tumorMammographyCancerOncologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Occult primary breast cancer presenting as axillary metastasis is a very rare entity of breast cancer. Diagnosis and treatment management represent a real challenge in the absence of consensual attitude.  We report 3 cases of occult breast cancer who presented with metastatic nodule in the axilla. Although histology identified a metastatic adenocarcinoma in the lymph nodes, mammography failed to detect the primary tumor. Immunohistochemistry showed that the biopsied lymph nodes were positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors in all cases, suggesting the breast as the site of the primary tumor. Breast MRI was normal in addition to thoraco-abdomino-pelvic scan. Axillary dissection was performed with breast conservation followed by ipsilateral breast radiotherapy, then adjuvant chemotherapy. They are currently being treated with tamoxifen without evidence of disease with a median follow up of 8 months. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jcgo42w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207