MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969754700 · doi:10.1080/07399332.2014.919581

Occupational Types and Antenatal Care Attendance Among Women in Ghana

2014· article· en· W1969754700 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuel Banchani, Eric Y. Tenkorang

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Care For Women International · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttendanceSocioeconomic statusBivariate analysisMedicineMultivariate analysisLogistic regressionLogitEnvironmental healthPopulationEconomic growthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improving antenatal care is considered a priority and has been relevant toward achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), yet antenatal care attendance remains relatively low in Ghana. Guided by the Andersen and Newman framework and employing logit models, we examine associations between occupational types and antenatal care among Ghanaian women aged 15-49. Type of occupation, conceptualized as a predisposing factor, has a significant impact on the frequency and timing of antenatal care attendance at the bivariate level. The effect of occupational type was considerably mediated, however, when other socioeconomic variables such as wealth status were controlled in the multivariate models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth Care For Women InternationalSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207