MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969776874 · doi:10.1109/sahcnw.2009.5172926

Decoupled optimization of interference aware routing and scheduling for throughput maximization in wireless relay mesh networks

2009· article· en· W1969776874 on OpenAlexaff
Preetha Thulasiraman, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Time division multiple accessWireless mesh networkRelayColumn generationWirelessScheduleWireless networkDistributed computingEngineeringMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The wireless relay mesh network (WRMN) is designed to provide robust and fault tolerant communications between relay and user nodes in broadband wireless networks. In this paper, we investigate the benefits of decoupled optimization of routing and scheduling in WRMNs using the physical interference model and spatial reuse to maximize overall throughput. We model the routing optimization as a linear program using multicommodity flows (MCF). We refer to this problem as multicommodity flow routing optimization (MCF-ROPT). Using the flow per link determined from MCF-ROPT, we develop an optimization formulation to schedule the link traffic such that interference is minimized and time slots are reused appropriately based on spatial TDMA (STDMA). Furthermore, our scheduling approach incorporates the effect of reuse of multiple carriers on the transmission schedule. We refer to this problem as SM-TSS (STDMA multicarrier traffic sensitive scheduling). The SM-TSS is NP-hard and thus is solved using column generation. We compare our formulations with decoupled optimizations that use the protocol interference model and/or single carrier systems and show that our approach guarantees higher throughput by mitigating interference effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207