Structural Characteristics of Water‐Extractable Nonstarch Polysaccharides from Barley Malt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Water‐extractable (WE) material was isolated from a Canadian barley malt (cv. Harrington). The purified WE material contained mainly arabinoxylans, β‐glucans, proteins, and small amounts of arabinogalactans and mannose‐containing polymers. WE material was treated with specific enzymes to obtain two fractions: one enriched in arabinoxylan (AX) and another enriched in β‐glucan (BG). The AX fraction was further fractionated by stepwise precipitation in (NH4)2SO4 into five arabinoxylan subfractions. 1H‐NMR spectroscopy and sugar analyses revealed a relatively high content of unsubstituted xylose residues (48–58%) as well as a relatively high content of doubly substituted xylose residues (28–33%) in the structure of the arabinoxylans. β‐Glucans constituted a minor portion of water‐extractable malt polysaccharides and were characterized by high levels of tri‐ and tetrasaccharide residues (93.4%) with a molar ratio of 2.19 for cellotriosyl to cellotetraosyl units. Size‐exclusion chromatography revealed that the WE material contained several polymer populations. One population had a very high molecular weight that appeared to be the result of aggregation. The AX fraction contained higher molecular weight polymers than the BG fraction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".