MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969793582 · doi:10.1139/p01-102

Ga-NMR local susceptibility of the Kagome-based magnet SrCr<sub>9<i>p</i></sub> Ga<sub>129<i>p</i></sub>O<sub>19</sub>: A high-temperature study

2001· article· en· W1969793582 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
L. Limot, P. Mendels, G. Collin, C. Mondelli, H. Mutka, N. Blanchard

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAntiferromagnetismCondensed matter physicsPrime (order theory)Geometrical frustrationMagnetic susceptibilityCoupling (piping)SlabCrystallographyCombinatoricsMaterials scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a high-T Ga–NMR study in the Kagome-based anti-ferromagnetic compound SrCr 9p Ga 12–9p O 19 (0.81 [Formula: see text] p [Formula: see text] 0.96), and present a refined mean-field analysis of the local NMR susceptibility of Cr-frustrated moments. We find that the intralayer Kagome coupling is J = 86(6) K, and the interlayer coupling to non-Kagome Cr moments is J' = 69(7) K. The J' / J = 0.80(1) ratio confirms the common belief that the frustrated entity is a pyrochlore slab. PACS Nos.:75.30Cr, 75.50Lk, 76.60-k

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207