MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969800976 · doi:10.12660/gvcasosv4n2c16

The expansion of community banks in Brazil: discovering Palmas’ methodology

2014· article· en· W1969800976 on OpenAlexaff
Marlei Pozzebon, Tania Pereira Christopoulos, Jahan Ara Peeraly, Fabio Prado Saldanha

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira de Casos de Ensino em Administração · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Solidarity
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been 14 years since Banco Palmas was created. Joaquim Melo, its coordinator, feels that it is time to reconsider some of the fundamental premises upon which this community bank was built.DOI: 10.12660/gvcasosv4n2c16 http://dx.doi.org/10.12660/gvcasosv4n2c16

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Brasileira de Casos de Ensino em AdministraçãoSame topicSocial and Economic SolidarityFrench-language works237,207