The 1995–2000 interprefectural migration of foreign residents of Japan: salient features and multivariate explanation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Taking advantage of large samples from the 2000 census, this paper attempts (1) to identify the salient features of the 1995–2000 interprefectural migration of foreign residents in Japan; and (2) to carry out a multivariate explanation of this migration process by using a nested logit model which consists of a departure submodel at the upper level and a destination choice submodel at the lower level. Our main findings are as follows. Firstly, the migration process differed markedly between foreign residents and native Japanese. Secondly, the interprefectural migration process of the foreign residents was highly selective with respect to both ethnicity and educational attainment. Thirdly, the effects of labour‐market factors, co‐ethnic attraction and marital opportunities in the destination choice submodel conformed to expectations. Finally, the strong displacement effect of new immigrants in the departure submodel suggests that the foreign residents were competing with each other for rather limited economic opportunities in Japan. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it