The influence of horizontal walking velocity on the bilateral symmetry of normal ground reaction force parameters.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Assumptions regarding the bilateral symmetry of normal gait are common in both clinical and research settings. When assessing any aspect of human gait, the effect of horizontal velocity (HV) on the biomechanical characteristics of the activity is of great importance. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of horizontal walking velocity on the bilateral symmetry of gait in a normal population. Multiple peak and temporal ground reaction force (GRF) parameters were collected from a pre-screened subject pool of 21 able-bodied individuals at each of three HV conditions (slow, normal & fast) and two contact foot (CF) conditions (right & left). Statistical analysis of this GRF data was accomplished by means of a series of 2 x 3 repeated measures ANOVAs. The most interesting findings were two significant interaction effects of HV and CF for the stance time and the maximum vertical force at push-off (Fz3) parameters. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis2002 .G63. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 41-04, page: 1030. Adviser: Wayne Marino. Thesis (M.H.K.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2002.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".