MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

How to Facilitate the Orientation of New Nurses Into the Workplace

2002· article· en· W1969813959 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mélanie Lavoie‐Tremblay, Chantal Viens, Marie Forcier, Nicole Labrosse, Michelle N. Lafrance, Denise Laliberté, Marie-Laure Lebeuf

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal for Nurses in Staff Development · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
FundersCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de QuébecUniversité Laval
KeywordsOrientation (vector space)PsychologyKey (lock)Descriptive researchNursingMedical educationNursing staffSociologyComputer scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The orientation of new nursing graduates into the workplace is an impressive challenge. A research study was performed to identify the key elements of a program that would address the various issues regarding this orientation. A team of researchers from Laval University and the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec (CHUQ) used a descriptive and participative research method and identified five key elements that must be considered in order for this orientation to succeed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal for Nurses in Staff DevelopmentSame topicJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorFrench-language works237,207