MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969816485 · doi:10.1021/ja101908k

Ultrathin Bi<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> Nanowires: Surface and Core Structure at the Cluster-Nanocrystal Transition

2010· article· en· W1969816485 on OpenAlexafffund
Jordan W. Thomson, Ludovico Cademartiri, Mark MacDonald, Srebri Petrov, G. Calestani, Peng Zhang, Geoffrey A. Ozin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChemistryNanocrystalNanowireCluster (spacecraft)Core (optical fiber)NanotechnologyCrystallographyTransition metalChemical physicsCatalysisOpticsPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herein, we present the structural characterization of the core and surface of colloidally stable ultrathin bismuth sulfide (Bi(2)S(3)) nanowires using X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (EXAFS and XANES), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). These three techniques allowed the conclusive structural characterization of the inorganic core as well as the coordination chemistry of the surface ligands of these structures, despite the absence of significant translational periodicity dictated by their ultrathin diameter (1.6 nm) and their polycrystallinity. The atomic structure of the inorganic core is analogous to bulk bismuthinite, but Bi atoms display a remarkably higher coordination number than in the bulk. This can be only explained by a model in which each bismuth atom at the surface (or in close proximity to it) is bound to at least one ligand at any time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207