Re: Low Age Adjusted Free Testosterone Levels Correlate With Poorly Differentiated Prostate Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyLetter to the Editor/errata1 Dec 2006Re: Low Age Adjusted Free Testosterone Levels Correlate With Poorly Differentiated Prostate CancerI. F. San Francisco, M. M. Regan, W. C. DeWolf and A. F. Olumi, J Urol, 175: 1341–1346, 2006 Alvaro Morales Alvaro MoralesAlvaro Morales More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.029AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Re: Low Age Adjusted Free Testosterone Levels Correlate With Poorly Differentiated Prostate Cancer." The Journal of Urology, 176(6), p. 2746 References 1 : Andropause: is the emperor wearing any cloths?. Rev Endocr Metab Disord2005; 6: 77. Google Scholar 2 : Analytical and physiological factors affecting the interpretation of serum testosterone concentration in men. Ann Clin Biochem2006; 43: 3. Google Scholar 3 : Serum testosterone assays—accuracy matters. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2004; 89: 520. Google Scholar 4 : An extraordinarily inaccurate assay for free testosterone is still with us. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2001; 86: 2903. Google Scholar 5 : Evaluation of assays available to measure free testosterone. Metabolism2002; 51: 554. Google Scholar Queen’s University and Centre for Urological Research, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3J7© 2006 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 176Issue 6December 2006Page: 2746 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2006 by American Urological AssociationMetricsAuthor Information Alvaro Morales More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.088 | 0.043 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".