MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969868836 · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00277.2002

Functional analysis of gap junctions in ovarian granulosa cells: distinct role for connexin43 in early stages of folliculogenesis

2003· article· en· W1969868836 on OpenAlexaff
Joanne E. I. Gittens, Abdul Amir Mhawi, Darcy Lidington, Yves Ouellette, Gerald M. Kidder

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityChildren’s Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGap junctionConnexinFolliculogenesisConnexonCell biologyBiologyPopulationGranulosa cellMutantInternal medicineEndocrinologyChemistryIntracellularOvaryGeneGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ovarian granulosa cells are coupled via gap junctions containing connexin43 (Cx43 or alpha-1 connexin). In the absence of Cx43, granulosa cells stop growing in an early preantral stage. However, the fact that granulosa cells of mature follicles express multiple connexins complicated interpretation of this finding. The present experiments were designed to clarify the role of Cx43 vs. these other connexins in the earliest stages of folliculogenesis. Dye injection experiments revealed that granulosa cells from Cx43 knockout follicles are not coupled, and this was confirmed by ionic current injections. Furthermore, electron microscopy revealed that gap junctions are extremely rare in mutant granulosa cells. In contrast, mutant granulosa cells were able to form gap junctions with wild-type granulosa cells in a dye preloading assay. It was concluded that mutant granulosa cells contain a population of connexons, composed of an unidentified connexin, that do not normally contribute to gap junctions. Therefore, although Cx43 is not the only gap junction protein present in granulosa cells of early preantral follicles, it is the only one that makes a significant contribution to intercellular coupling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score0.938

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Cell PhysiologySame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207