MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The effect of angle fluctuations in the multi-second-harmonic generation process of two-dimensional aperiodic optical superlattices

2013· article· en· W1969880771 on OpenAlex
Nafiseh Sang-Nourpour, Reza Kheradmand, M. Rezaei, M.A. Nemati, M Goalipour

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica Scripta · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAperiodic graphSuperlatticeSecond-harmonic generationHarmonicOpticsProcess (computing)PhysicsMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsComputer scienceMathematicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dependence of multi-frequency second-harmonic generation efficiency on the fluctuation in the angle between the interacting waves in the two-dimensional aperiodic optical superlattice is investigated in this paper. It is found that the efficiency of second-harmonic generation is a function of parameters that have an essential and critical role in maintaining the phase-matching condition, one of which is the angle between interacting waves in nonlinear crystal. Applying a comparison between the exact and fluctuated situations in a two-dimensional nonlinear aperiodic optical superlattice causes the output efficiency of the multi-frequency process to be decreased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it