MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969890529 · doi:10.5555/1162708.1163154

Analysis of production authorization card schemes using simulation and neural network metamodels

2005· article· en· W1969890529 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWinter Simulation Conference · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEmulationDiscrete event simulationArtificial neural networkKanbanProduction controlProduction (economics)Industrial engineeringReliability engineeringControl (management)SimulationEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have developed a framework to model and analyze the performance of complex manufacturing systems operating under a variety of production control strategies. This framework involves a production authorization card scheme, which enables emulation of many popular strategies such as kanban or Base Stock systems. A discrete-event simulation model of the manufacturing system produces estimates of the multiple system performance measures, such as average work-in-process inventory and customer service rates, for combinations of control parameters. Finally, neural network metamodels are trained to approximate the expected value of these system performance measures, using a subset of parameter combinations and the corresponding performance estimates generated by the simulation model. We will show that this framework provides a flexible means of conducting analysis of the impact of parameter settings on the performance of the system, and is a viable alternative to simulation optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it