MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969897088 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2014.6865084

Speech emotion recognition based on entropy of enhanced wavelet coefficients

2014· article· en· W1969897088 on OpenAlexaff
Sharifa Sultana, Celia Shahnaz, Shaikh Anowarul Fattah, I. Ahmmed, Wei‐Ping Zhu, M. Omair Ahmad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeech recognitionEuclidean distanceWaveletEmotion recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceEntropy (arrow of time)Emotion classificationArtificial intelligenceFeature extractionComputationSupport vector machineWavelet transformClassifier (UML)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a speaker-independent speech emotion recognition method, where emotional features are derived from the Teager energy (TE) operated wavelet coefficients of speech signal. Due to TE operation, the enhanced detail as well as approximate Wavelet coefficients thus obtained is then used to compute entropy. Entropy values of TE operated detail and approximate wavelet coefficients not only reduces feature dimension but also form an effective feature vector for distinguishing different emotions when fed to a Euclidean distance based classifier. Extensive simulations are carried out using EMO-DB German speech emotion database containing four class emotions, such as angry, happy, sad and neutral. Simulation results show that the proposed method is capable of outperforming an existing speaker-independent emotion recognition method thus solving a four-class emotion recognition problem in terms of higher recognition accuracy with lower computation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207