Trends in the Carbonyl Core (C 1S, O 1S) → π*<sub>C=O</sub> Transition in the Near-Edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectra of Organic Molecules
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carbonyl core (C 1s, O 1s) → π* C O transitions are distinctive in the near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectra of species containing carbonyl groups. These features are used for the chemical microanalysis of organic materials using X-ray microscopy. We have explored the chemical sensitivity of these features in C 1s and O 1s NEXAFS spectra for a series of polymers containing the carbonyl group in a range of different bonding environments. Ab initio calculations are used to explain the origin of the observed trends and to explore the effect that orbital interactions have on the energy of these core (C 1s, O 1s) → π* C O features. The differences between the experimental and the calculated carbonyl core (C 1s, O 1s) → π* C O transition energies are systematic and can be used to develop a semiempirical method for predicting the absolute (experimental) transition energies from the calculated transition energies. This relationship is applied to a large body of calculated transition energy data to prepare correlation diagrams for the carbonyl (C 1s, O 1s) → π* C O transitions. These correlation diagrams will be useful for the analytical application of NEXAFS spectroscopy to organic materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it