MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction

2009· article· en· W1969922338 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Interventional Cardiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTakotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated Phenomena
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreNorth York General HospitalSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentricular outflow tract obstructionCardiologyInternal medicineCardiomyopathyMyocardial infarctionVentricular outflow tractInotropeHemodynamicsShock (circulatory)Cardiac catheterizationHeart failureHypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy often presents to the cardiac catheterization laboratory masquerading as acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Some of these patients present in shock secondary to dynamic left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. The typical patient is an elderly, hypertensive female with sigmoid deformity of the intraventricular septum. The management of hemodynamic instability in these patients is different from patients with STEMI. While hemodynamic instability in the setting of STEMI is usually treated with inotropic agents and intraaortic balloon counterpulsation, these therapies can increase LVOT pressure gradients in patients with takotsubo cardiomyopathy and lead to deepening of shock and worse outcomes. Thus accurate diagnosis and correct management are essential to prevent mortality in these patients, who will usually go on to have good long-term outcomes. This case report and literature review addresses the clinical characteristics, outcome, and management of these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it