Polémique sur un « mauvais livre » : L’appel de la race de Lionel Groulx*
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La publication de L’appel de la race par l’abbé Groulx en 1922 a déclenché une polémique violente dans les milieux intellectuels canadiens-français. Cependant, il est difficile aujourd’hui de comprendre les enjeux du débat. Ni la question des droits des minorités linguistiques, ni celle de la pertinence des idées de Groulx sur le mariage mixte ou les croisements de « races » ne sont ouvertement discutées. En revanche, une place considérable est accordée à des questions de théologie morale, et l’on tâche de présenter le roman de l’abbé comme « dangereux ». Derrière ces arguments, il est toutefois possible de distinguer un débat politique qui n’ose (ou ne sait) s’afficher comme tel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it