MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969934681 · doi:10.1115/1.4006551

Piecewise B-Spline Tool Paths With the Arc-Length Parameter and Their Application on High Feed, Accurate CNC Milling of Free-Form Profiles

2012· article· en· W1969934681 on OpenAlexaff
Zezhong C. Chen, Maqsood Ahmed Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParameterized complexityPiecewiseSpline (mechanical)Arc lengthB-splineMathematicsArc (geometry)KinematicsMachiningAlgorithmGeometryComputer scienceMathematical analysisEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To conduct B-spline curve machining, first, B-spline tool paths with feed rates are planned; and second, the B-spline interpolator generates tool trajectories in real-time based on the paths fed into the computer numerically controlled (CNC) controller. Currently, the paths are often planned geometrically with a nonarc-length parameter. Literally, the interpolator can process B-spline paths with the arc-length parameter well, while it sometimes is challenged to work with the nonarc-length parameterized B-spline paths. As a consequence, it is difficult to ensure high accuracy of the tool trajectories in B-spline machining in terms of their corresponding paths; especially, if the feed is very high, smooth tool kinematics cannot be well maintained. To root out these problems, a new type of tool path—piecewise B-spline tool paths with the arc-length parameter—is first proposed in this work. Given a B-spline path with a nonarc-length parameter, it is accurately converted into a B-spline path with an arc-length parameter before sending it into the CNC controller. Furthermore, if the prescribed feed rate is very high and the arc-length parameterized B-spline path is disqualified, it is split into pieces represented with distinct arc-length parameterized B-spline paths in different feed rates. The main advantage of these piecewise paths is that they can eliminate the problems encountered by the existing B-spline interpolator with input of nonarc-length parameterized B-spline paths. Therefore, the piecewise arc-length parameterized B-spline paths are a genuine solution to high feed-and-accuracy B-spline machining.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Manufacturing Science and EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Numerical Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207