Hemivertebra Resection by a Posterior Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was conducted, with clinical evaluation of hemivertebra resection using transpedicular instrumentation by a posterior approach in young children. OBJECTIVE: To assess a new method of early intervention in congenital scoliosis by a posterior approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previously described surgical procedures are fusion in situ, hemiepiphyseodesis and arthrodesis, "growing" instrumentations, and hemivertebra resections performed by a combined anterior and posterior approach. METHODS: For this study, 21 consecutive cases of congenital scoliosis managed by hemivertebra resection using a posterior approach only with transpedicular instrumentation were investigated retrospectively, with at least a 2-year follow-up period. Surgery was performed in patients who had congenital scoliosis with proven or expected deterioration, or pain resulting from the malformation. RESULTS: The mean Cobb angle of the main curve was 41 degrees before surgery, 14 degrees after surgery, and 15 degrees at the latest follow-up assessment. The angle of kyphosis was 24 degrees before surgery, but improved to 11 degrees after surgery. There was one infection, one pedicle fracture, and two failures of the initially used wire instrumentation. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior resection of hemivertebrae with transpedicular instrumentation is a safe and promising procedure that offers significant advantages for controlling congenital deformity: excellent correction in both the frontal and sagittal planes, short segment of fusion, high stability, no need for an anterior approach, and low neurologic risk. Surgery should be performed as early as possible to avert severe local deformities, to prevent secondary structural changes, and to avert extensive fusions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it