MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969951206 · doi:10.1039/c2cs15286j

Expanding the organic toolbox: a guide to integrating biocatalysis in synthesis

2012· review· en· W1969951206 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Society Reviews · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Canadian institutionsCentre in Green Chemistry and CatalysisUniversité de MontréalPROTEO
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiocatalysisBiochemical engineeringToolboxNanotechnologyIdentification (biology)Computer scienceChemistryCatalysisEngineeringOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceBiologyReaction mechanismEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This critical review presents an introduction to biocatalysis for synthetic chemists. Advances in biocatalysis of the past 5 years illustrate the breadth of applications for these powerful and selective catalysts in conducting key reaction steps. Asymmetric synthesis of value-added targets and other reaction types are covered, with an emphasis on pharmaceutical intermediates and bulk chemicals. Resources of interest for the non-initiated are provided, including specialized websites and service providers to facilitate identification of suitable biocatalysts, as well as references to recent volumes and reviews for more detailed biocatalytic procedures. Challenges related to the application of biocatalysts are discussed, including how 'green' a biocatalytic reaction may be, and trends in biocatalyst improvement through enzyme engineering are presented (152 references).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it