Random walk of magnetic field lines in dynamical turbulence: A field line tracing method. II. Two-dimensional turbulence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The wandering of magnetic field lines is an important topic in theoretical plasma physics and astrophysics. Previous analytical work, as well as computer simulations, is based on magnetostatic models to warrant mathematical and numerical tractability. Recently, we have studied the first time field line random walk in dynamical turbulence by using a field line tracing method. These calculations were performed for a slab model of the turbulence. It is the purpose of the present paper to use the latter method to compute the field line diffusion coefficient for dynamical two-dimensional turbulence. Two models for the dynamical correlation function are used, namely the damping model of dynamical turbulence and the nonlinear anisotropic dynamical turbulence model. It is shown that the largest scales of the turbulence and the choice of the dynamical turbulence model have a strong influence on the diffusivity of the field lines and the absolute value of the diffusion coefficient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".