Bibliographic record
Abstract
Harmonie et disharmonie « La consonance [consonantia] est l'accord [concordia], réduit à l'unité [in unum redacta], de sons dissemblables [dissimilium inter se vocum De institutione musica, traité de musique composé vers 510 qui synthétise les principes fondamentaux de la théorie pythagoricienne et platonicienne de la musique et qui, de l'époque 1 .La consonance ne concerne donc pas tant les sons qui entretiennent une relation d'identité ou de similitude, que ceux qui se distinguent les uns des autres selon un rapport d'inégalité.Il n'y aurait pas besoin de consonance, en effet, s'il n'y avait au préalable une différence.La consonance désigne du même coup la résolution d'une disparité entre des sons distincts (comme entre toutes sortes d'éléments dissemblables), de sorte qu'ils s'unissent et composent un ensemble dont dit que « les sons qui, faute de rapport d'inégalité, ne discordent pas (quae nulla inaequalitate discordant), ne réalisent aucune consonance du tout 2 ».concordia discors, qui remonte à l'Antiquité, il n'y a pas d'harmonie sans disharmonie 3 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".