Aggressive Behavior of Stage I Ovarian Mucinous Tumors Lacking Extensive Infiltrative Invasion: A Report of Four Cases and Review of the Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies have indicated that mucinous carcinomas of the ovary associated with extraovarian spread at the time of presentation or follow-up almost always have extensive infiltrative invasion within the primary tumor. We present four cases of stage I ovarian mucinous tumors that lacked extensive infiltrative invasion but were associated with an unexpectedly aggressive behavior. The patients were 18, 20, 41, and 45 years of age at presentation. All four of them presented with an abdominal mass or increased abdominal girth. The tumors were all stage Ia, 17 to 37 centimeters in maximal dimension, and typically multicystic with solid areas. The number of blocks per centimeter of tumor diameter was 0.65, 0.88, 0.92, and 1.0 in the four tumors, respectively, a degree of sampling within that recommended in previous studies. Clinical findings supported that they were primary tumors rather than metastatic from an occult primary tumor. On microscopic examination, the tumors all contained foci of intraepithelial carcinoma and foci of invasion as follows: expansile invasion only (two cases), expansile invasion and microinvasive carcinoma (one case), and microinvasive carcinoma only (one case). The expansile invasion was extensive in each of the three cases in which it was present. On follow-up, each patient experienced recurrent disease 7 months to 4.5 years after diagnosis, including hematogenous spread to lung and/or bone and liver in three patients. Three of four patients developed intraperitoneal spread. Three of four patients died of disease, and one patient is alive with persistent disease. Although ovarian mucinous tumors with only expansile invasion or only microinvasive carcinoma are usually associated with an excellent prognosis, this study indicates that these tumors can rarely behave in an aggressive fashion with hematogenous spread and a fatal outcome. Some of these tumors may have contained unsampled foci of infiltrative invasion. Although the optimum level of sampling in mucinous tumors remains to be determined, we recommend additional sampling of tumors in which the initial sections reveal intraepithelial carcinoma, microinvasive carcinoma, expansile invasion, or combinations thereof.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".