Agile unmanned vehicle navigation in highly confined environments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current Unmanned Vehicle (UV) navigation systems are capable of autonomous navigation among disperse obstacles. However, these systems may fail to guide vehicles through highly confined environments because they do not explicitly consider the geometry of the vehicle in the navigation task. This paper presents a methodology that enables the navigation of Unmanned Vehicles (UVs) in such 3D environments. The proposed approach uses a hybrid navigation architecture which employs a global path planner and a local obstacle avoidance methodology in parallel and combines them utilizing an improved Model Predictive Control (MPC) approach that incorporates the geometry of the UV in the cost function. Using MPC enables the UV to generate complex maneuvering trajectories while avoiding obstacles, respecting the dynamic characteristics of the UV and preventing state and input saturation. Simulations in 2D and 3D demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method for the navigation of a highly maneuverable Rotary Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (RUAV) in a highly confined environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it